वित्त मंत्रालय के तहत एक स्वायत्त अनुसंधान संस्थान

 

Events

Seminar

Taking the model to the data: evidence on inflation in India

  • Speaker Pulapre Balakrishnan
  • Speaker profile

    Professor of Economics, Ashoka University, Sonepat, India.

  • Date शुक्र, 18 दिसमबर, 2015
  • Time 03:30 बजे - 05:00 बजे
  • Venue NIPFP Auditorium
  • Abstract

    Central banks throughout the world predict inflation with new-Keynesian models in which, after a shock, the unemployment rate returns to its so called "natural rate". Accordingly, inflation is related to the output gap, being the deviation of output from its natural level. I present the results of quite extensive testing of this proposition and related recommendations for the conduct of monetary policy. We also test a rudimentary version of an alternative approach currently out of fashion. While this is work-in-progress yet, the results are conclusive and bear significance for the understanding of inflation in India.

  • Contact email nipfp.seminar@nipfp.org.in

Seminar

Challenges of health policy and key recommendations in the Indian context

  • Speaker Peter Berman and Jeffrey S. Hammer
  • Speaker profile
     
    Peter Berman is Professor of the Practice of Global Health Systems and Economics at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. He is the faculty director of Harvard Chan’s Doctor of Public Health degree, director of education for global health and population at Harvard Chan and actively engaged in graduate education reform in global public health at Harvard Chan. Prof. Berman is also the visiting professor at the Public Health Foundation of India and adviser to the China National Health Development Research Center for health care financing and health accounts. He chairs the Financing Technical Working Group of the Countdown to 2015. Currently, Prof. Berman leads several innovative projects on developing primary care systems, strengthening service delivery, health system reform, and improving health care financing mechanisms for better outcomes, with a focus on work in Ethiopia, India, and Malaysia. He is a co-coordinator with Prof. Viswanath of Harvard Chan’s India Health Partnership.
      
    Jeffrey Hammer is a Visiting Professor in Economic Development at Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University. Jeff comes to the Woodrow Wilson School after 25 years at the World Bank, where he held various positions related to public economics, the last three in the New Delhi Office, and was an author of the World Development Report 2004 - "Making Services Work for Poor People". His research interests include economic development, public economics and health in poor countries, particularly in Asia and Africa and more particularly in South Asia. His current research is on the quality of medical care in India, absenteeism of teachers and health workers, determinants of health status and improving service delivery through better accountability mechanisms. He has received Ph. D from Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
     
  • Date मंगल, 15 दिसमबर, 2015
  • Time 04:30 बजे - 06:00 बजे
  • Venue Conference hall, Ground Floor, R&T building, NIPFP
  • Contact email nipfp.seminar@nipfp.org.in

Conference

14th Research Meeting of NIPFP-DEA Research Program (CALL FOR PAPERS)

  • Date शुक्र, 11 दिसमबर, 2015 - शनि, 12 दिसमबर, 2015
  • Venue Hill Fort Kesroli, Alwar, Rajasthan
  • Details

     

    Call for Papers

     

    On behalf of National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi and the Department of Economic Affairs of the Ministry of Finance, New Delhi, the organisers invite papers for the 14th Research Meeting of the NIPFP-DEA Research Program. This builds on the preceding 13 such meetings.

     

    The meetings have a blend of academic scholars, senior policy makers and finance practitioners. The theme for the 14th Research meeting is macroeconomics and finance, with an accent on capital controls, capital flows, international finance including firm internationalisation, the exchange rate regime and monetary policy. Papers that illuminate these issues in emerging markets are of particular interest.

     

    Extended abstracts or papers (completed papers preferred) should be sent to the e-mail address anurodh54@gmail.com on or before 30 September 2015. The organisers will provide local hospitality and partial air fare for academic presenters.

     

  • Contact email anurodh54@gmail.com

Seminar

Designing Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers for Forest Conservation: The Case of REDD+ in Indonesia

  • Speaker Luca Tacconi
  • Speaker profile

    Professor of Environmental Governance, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University

  • Date गुरू, 29 अक्टूबर, 2015
  • Time 03:30 बजे - 05:00 बजे
  • Venue NIPFP Auditorium
  • Abstract

    Intergovernmental fiscal transfers (IFTs) are an innovative way to create incentives for local public actors to support conservation. Local governments’ capacity to generate revenues from alternative land-use activities may be restricted by conservation, and compensation to reconcile local costs with the benefits of conservation that reach beyond local boundaries needs to be considered. This presentation considers some of the key elements of the design of IFTs, including distribution formula, conditionality and accountability. The design of IFTs is presented in the context of forest conservation and REDD+ in Indonesia, which was selected as the case study because of the significance of its forests, the large amount of emissions of greenhouse gases it generates, and its implementation of decentralization in public administration.

  • Contact email nipfp.seminar@nipfp.org.in

Seminar

The Nature of the Market for Corporate Control in India

  • Speaker Dr. Umakanth Varottil
  • Speaker profile

    Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore.

  • Date बुध, 05 अगस्त, 2015
  • Time 03:00 बजे - 04:00 बजे
  • Venue Ground floor conference hall, R&T building, NIPFP
  • Abstract

    Given its deep and liquid stock markets, India presents a favourable environment for public takeovers. In order to develop and regulate takeover activity, India’s securities regulator the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has enacted specific regulations. While at a broad level these regulations appear to attribute their origins to the UK and other countries that have adopted the UK model or its variants, I argue in this paper that takeover regulation in India bears fundamental differences and unique characteristics that have necessitated special treatment.

    Due to the prevalence of concentrated shareholdings in Indian companies, the incidence of hostile takeovers has been negligible. While SEBI’s takeover regulations do not confer much power to the target’s board to set up takeover defences, the nature of concentration of shareholdings and other factors offer sufficient protection to incumbent shareholders and managements against corporate raiders. Hence, substantial attention in India is focused on the mandatory bid rule (MBR), which operates to grant equality of treatment to minority shareholders by conferring them an exit option in case of a change in control. India’s takeover regulations are arguably stringent in implementing the MBR. This impedes value enhancing takeovers unless they are effected with the concurrence of the controlling shareholders, who could potentially block them.

    Added to this, India’s takeover regulations confer benefits on incumbents that would impede a market for corporate control in the conventional sense. For example, promoters can take advantage of creeping acquisition limits, and also certain exemptions from the MBR when they enhance their positions in the company. Hence, while the takeover regulation overtly appears designed to engender a market for corporate control, its operation coupled with the corporate structure and culture in India attenuate the possibility of takeovers.

    Relying upon the political economy of takeover regulation, and more specifically the interest group theory, my goal in this paper is to demonstrate the influence of promoters in shaping India’s takeover regulation. I seek to do so both analytically and empirically. While the Indian markets have witnessed a constant stream of takeovers, they are almost entirely organized changes of control in a friendly manner that trigger the MBR. Voluntary, unsolicited offers that are common in the more developed markets are miniscule in number in India.

  • Contact email nipfp.seminar@nipfp.org.in

Seminar

Federal Fiscal Relations in the US- One Long View with Some Details about the Design of General Revenue Sharing

  • Speaker Robert P. Strauss
  • Speaker profile

    Professor of Economics & Public Policy,
    The H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management,
    Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

  • Date मंगल, 28 जुलाई, 2015
  • Time 02:30 बजे - 04:00 बजे
  • Venue NIPFP Auditorium
  • Contact email nipfp.seminar@nipfp.org.in

Seminar

The GST Bill and thereafter

  • Speaker Dr V. Bhaskar
  • Speaker profile

    Retired civil servant

  • Date शुक्र, 10 जुलाई, 2015
  • Time 03:30 बजे - 05:00 बजे
  • Venue NIPFP Auditorium
  • Abstract

    The GST Constitutional Amendment Bill is now being examined by the Select Committee of the Rajya Sabha. This article highlights some issues relating to the Bill, which need to be considered by the Select Committee. In an effort to bring the states on board, the Bill has proposed both a diluted GST framework and a weak implementation structure. Excluding alcohol, real estate and electricity duty will attenuate the GST base and inflate the Revenue Neutral Rate. The levy of the proposed additional tax based upon origin will impose barriers to trade, result in tax cascading, and hamper competitiveness of Indian industry. The Bill does not bring closure to the debate on the GST design and implementation. This is left to the GST Council to be set up in the future. In such a case, the GST Council should have been empowered to enforce its recommendations, but this has not been done. Four clauses of the Bill do not amend the Constitution at all and their presence in the Bill requires review. A number of other drafting changes are necessary in the Bill consistent with legal requirements.

  • Contact email nipfp.seminar@nipfp.org.in

Seminar

On Autonomous Devolution from the Centre and Provision of Local Public Goods

  • Speaker Vivekananda Mukherjee
  • Speaker profile

    Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.

  • Date गुरू, 25 जून, 2015
  • Time 03:30 बजे - 05:00 बजे
  • Venue NIPFP Auditorium
  • Abstract

    In recent times the Fourteenth Finance Commission of India has undertaken a major shift towards fiscal autonomy of the states by recommending a substantial increase in tax devolution from 32% to 42% of the divisible pool of union taxes to the states. The union government has reacted by lowering its grants to the states. The question arises: would the step taken by the Finance Commission ultimately reduce the provision of local public goods at the states, a possibility that would need additional policy intervention for controlling the behavior of the union government. The paper discusses the issue theoretically and defines the conditions under which the increase in autonomous transfer to the states would actually increase in provision of local public goods at the states.

  • Contact email nipfp.seminar@nipfp.org.in

Workshop

New Development Bank (NDB)

  • Date गुरू, 18 जून, 2015 - शुक्र, 19 जून, 2015
  • Venue Nilgiri Hall, Oberoi Hotel, New Delhi
  • Details

    Two-day BRICS Experts Workshop on New Development Bank (NDB), jointly organized by the Observer Research Foundation and NIPFP


Seminar

CBPS, NIPFP, and The World Bank Seminar on “Enhancing Performance through Improved Budgeting”


Seminar

Minimising Selection Failure and Measuring Tax Gap: An empirical model

  • Speaker Dr. Sudhanshu Kumar, Assistant Professor, NIPFP, New Delhi
  • Date सोम, 11 मई, 2015
  • Time 04:00 बजे - 05:00 बजे
  • Venue NIPFP Auditorium
  • Abstract

    This paper presents an empirical model for minimising selection failure by the tax departments in selecting cases for scrutiny assessment. This model also provides a new methodology for estimating tax gap from limited information that the department collects on a regular basis through scrutiny assessments. Using a maximum-likelihood procedure that corrects for sample selection bias, and the data on the scrutiny assessment exercise carried out by the income tax department, we estimate the model which relates the probability and extent of underreporting to various inputs provided by the tax filer. The estimated model provides a mechanism to analyze the trade-off between the two types of cases of failure- wrong selection of a case and failure to take up the potential under reporter.

  • Contact email nipfp.seminar@nipfp.org.in

Seminar

Panel Discussion on India Development Update: April 2015 Towards a Higher Growth Path

  • Date गुरू, 30 अप्रैल, 2015
  • Time 03:30 बजे - 05:30 बजे
  • Venue NIPFP Auditorium, New Delhi
  • Schedule
  • Contact email nrbmurthy@gmail.com

Seminar

Estimation of unaccounted income using transport as a universal input: A methodological note

  • Speaker Dr. Sacchidananda Mukherjee, Associate Professor, NIPFP, New Delhi
  • Date सोम, 06 अप्रैल, 2015
  • Time 04:00 बजे - 05:30 बजे
  • Venue NIPFP Auditorium
  • Abstract

    Based on availability of diesel for road freight transport, stock of goods carriages, average freight transport capacity per vehicle, average annual distance travel and average fuel efficiency per vehicle, we estimate annual supply of road freight transport for India. We also estimate annual demand for road freight transport based on Input-Output (I-O) Table and other macro variables available in National Account Statistics (NAS). In an ideal situation, supply of road freight transport should match the demand for a given period (say annual), and if not, there is a possibility for under reporting of GDP. The supply of road freight transport which is not realized in official estimate of GDP could be considered as unaccounted GDP and based on this broad framework, this study estimates the unaccounted GDP for India. To check the robustness of the estimates, the analysis is carried out with two consecutive I-O Tables (2003-04 and 2007-08) and for three consecutive years (2009-10 to 2011-12) to weed annual fluctuations in demand and supply.

  • Contact email nipfp.seminar@nipfp.org.in

Special lecture

Issues in India`s External Sector

  • Speaker Dr. C. Rangarajan
  • Date शुक्र, 13 मार्च, 2015
  • Time 06:30 बजे - 08:30 बजे
  • Venue Multipurpose Hall, India International Centre, New Delhi
  • Details

    5th Raja Chelliah Memorial Lecture

  • Download lecture

Conference

Papers in Public Economics and Policy

  • Date गुरू, 12 मार्च, 2015 - शुक्र, 13 मार्च, 2015
  • Venue NIPFP Auditorium
  • Schedule
  • Contact email nrbmurthy@gmail.com

Seminar

Five Institutions Union Budget Seminar 2015-16 on Reform and Development Perspectives

  • Date सोम, 09 मार्च, 2015
  • Time 01:58 बजे - 06:00 बजे
  • Venue Diwan-I-Am, The Taj Mahal Hotel, 1, Mansingh Road, New Delhi
  • Abstract

    Five Institutions Union Budget Seminar 2015-16 on Reform and Development Perspectives, jointly organized by NIPFP, CPR, ICRIER, IDF & NCAER


Conference

13th Research Meeting of NIPFP-DEA Research Programme

  • Date शुक्र, 06 मार्च, 2015 - रवि, 08 मार्च, 2015
  • Venue Neemrana Fort Palace, Rajasthan

Workshop

An OECD - India Policy Dialogue on New Approaches to Economic Challenges (NAEC)

  • Date मंगल, 24 फ़रवरी, 2015
  • Time 09:00 बजे - 06:15 बजे
  • Venue NIPFP Auditorium
  • Schedule
  • Contact email nrbmurthy@gmail.com

Seminar

The Effect of Privatization on Economic Performance in Transitional Economies

  • Speaker Prof. S. Numura, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University
  • Date गुरू, 29 जनवरी, 2015
  • Time 04:00 बजे - 05:30 बजे
  • Venue NIPFP, Auditorium
  • Abstract

    Many eastern European countries have reformed their economic systems from a planned economy to a market economy and some of them succeed, and the others fail. It seems that there are two ways to secure the transition. The one is to execute large-scale privatization as quickly as possible. The other is to advance privatization gradually. The gradualists emphasize the importance of institutions such as legal system and financial infrastructure, and they would think that without the institutional infrastructure, privatization might lead to asset stripping rather than wealth creation.

     

    How privatization could affect economic growth depends not only on its scale as well as speed, but also on economic policy adopted by countries and how much a given political regime has a wide range of options. Countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet republics don’t have much a viable option, judging from recorded inflation levels and output losses. Given a severe breakdown in the central planning apparatus, they might not able to afford to postpone adjustment. In this case, it seems that rapid reform would be preferable to slow reform.

     

    In our paper, we consider which approaches are best to secure the transition. We examine all the factors such as economic policies, initial conditions and quality of governance in our estimation. We believe our paper has made some advances over earlier literature untangling the various factors affecting success in transition.

  • Contact email nipfp.seminar@nipfp.org.in